Wednesday, December 3, 2014

AI customer service!? Could that be a thing?


                In today’s world of instantaneous internet communication, it is faster and easier than ever to get a message out to consumers. Consumers have an unprecedented opportunity available to get their opinions and thoughts about a company heard by that company’s employees and leadership. Now that it’s easier on both sides to communicate, the question becomes how can the company keep up? As your company starts to reach a steadily wider audience of consumers soon your ability to respond to messages will be outpaced by the number of consumers sending messages in. Do you just hire more and more people to handle responding to these messages or do you just ignore them? Do you retain a small team of people to respond to the messages but only ever reply by prewritten messages that have no real relevance to the consumers comment? That would save a lot of time so you could keep your team small. With the progression of new technology I think there is a different option.

                Who has not heard of predictive texting? Almost all smart phones available today have some form of predictive text. This is where the smart phone will give you a few options of what it has predicted you are intending to say. It does this by having a database of words and phrases that are often used in conjunction. I just typed into my pre-installed smart phone keyboard the word “how” and one of the options it predicted I might like to use was “are.” I selected “are” from a list of 3 words and it then predicted that I might want to use the word “you” next. “How are you?” Now this is incredibly simple predictions. There is a digital keyboard company called Swiftkey that sells a digital keyboard for your phone that will replace the pre-installed digital keyboard. Swiftkey’s keyboard asks you if it can access your social media posts to learn words and phrases that you often use. I’ve used this keyboard and it would successfully predict some of the most interesting words that are very specific to how I type. It did this seeing that I had used these words and phrases often in other forums and predicted them when I was typing text messages.

                I would sometimes pull a prank on people I associate with by typing a text message that was one hundred percent predictions from the phone. These texts would always be funny because they were so close to making some kind of sense but they were just outside of the coherent range. Swiftkey and Intel worked together to make a technology for Stephen Hawking that will help him write faster by learning how he likes to talk and predicting the words it thinks he would like to use next. As this technology progresses it will be useful in more and more situations.


                Imagine if a technology like this started to predict fully developed responses as it is receiving communication. What if you set your phone to auto-respond to text messages? Maybe someone texts you asking how your day has been, and the auto-respond app looks up what you had scheduled that day and responds, “I’m doing good, but I’m really busy. I have a lot of things going on today and it’s pretty hectic.” As this technology progresses perhaps you could implement it to respond to your consumers in a more personal way.

That’s a funny thought that a message might feel more personal coming from a computer instead of a person.

If you have too many messages sent in from consumers and you can’t respond to them, likely you’re just going to send out a generic message that doesn’t take into account anything the person said. Maybe you’ll send them a few coupons to try and make them feel special. If this Swiftkey and Intel idea gets furthered you could have a computer read the message and respond in a very specific and appropriate way. If you set the computer to wait a few minutes before sending the response it would even feel like the concern or comment the consumer had was important and was being addressed quickly but thoughtfully. It would be infinitely cheaper than paying humans to do the work. Just have a few people monitoring the messages it’s going to send out and you have an inexpensive and effective way to respond to consumers that feels personal. The opportunities for changes in communication through technology are astounding.


Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Poor Communication Ruins a Man's Reputation

August 11th, 2014 a woman named Carol Jumper was laid off from her job working at an Oral Surgeons Office because she was diagnosed with cancer. Upon reading the previous sentence I am sure feelings of outrage and indignation would rise in many people. That one sentence likely represents all the facts the majority of the people commenting on social media cared to discover before posting rage filled and hateful comments all across the internet about this subject.

Carol Jumper worked had been working for Dr. Visnich at his Oral Surgery Office for 12 years when she was diagnosed with cancer. Dr. Visnich then sent her a letter telling her that because of her condition, “you will not be able to function in my office at the level required while battling for your life. Because of this, I am laying you off without pay as of August 11, 2014. Your last paycheck will be mailed to you this Friday, 8/15/14.” Most news outlets that I have obtained information from chose to select only this portion of the letter to disclose.

This man, Dr. Visnich, has been turned into a villain on social media. The hateful masses were only fueled by the initial reaction the media had to discovering the letter. It all started when one of Jumper’s friends got a hold of her letter and uploaded it to Facebook. It went viral quickly and spread across the internet. People were outraged about how evil and sinister this man was. On yellowpages.com his office has averaged a one star rating. The following review from Brandon W. is typical of the many one star reviews posted, “I hope you lose your business, your money, and everything you love. You'll rot in a special corner of hell.”  On Facebook there are many comments referencing Dr. Visnich such as the one posted by Julio A. Diaz, “You my s***** sir are a prick b****** a****** m************ piece of s*** b****** cold hearted c*** ******* slimmy sleeze bucket that deserves to lose your business.”   After being threatened and attacked on social media sites, Dr. Visnich asked his lawyer to help him clarify his intentions. His lawyer reported that Dr. Visnich realized that Jumper was going to be going through a very difficult time in her life and working at the office was not going to be something on her list of most fun things. He laid her off and did not fire her so that she could receive unemployment benefits. She filed a claim for unemployment and he did not contest it.

I believe that Dr. Visnich was a victim of his own poor communication. I believe that he actually was trying to do a good thing and had no malicious intent. Because of his choice of words and medium for delivering the message about laying off Jumper people across the internet quickly vilified him and began a quest of expressing rage towards him.

Dr. Visnich chose to send a letter only and send no other communique about Jumper being laid off. The fact that it was a letter communicates something. In this situation Jumper was an employee of 12 years for Dr. Visnich. Sending a letter felt impersonal and harsh to the public hearing about this story, despite it being handwritten. If I sent a letter of complaint or compliment to a company CEO and received back hand written letter, I would feel it was a personal touch and gratifying. In this situation it was the wrong choice, unless he called her first and the letter was just a formality.  He should have taken the time to call her and talk to her about the situation. He should have explained to her what his plan was and how she would be able to receive unemployment. He specifically stated in the letter why she was being let go. It was very clear that it had nothing to do with her misconduct and was because she would no longer be able to fulfill the expected duties agreed upon in her contract. I believe he wanted it to be clear that she qualified for unemployment and that she was not being fired. But the way he said it felt heartless and cold. “You will not be able to function in my office at the level required while battling for your life. Because of this, I am laying you off without pay as of August 11, 2014. Your last paycheck will be mailed to you this Friday, 8/15/14.” This line was the critical piece that outraged social media users who saw it. It’s too impersonal for the situation. Because he was laying her off and not firing her for misconduct, according to the Department of Labor she qualified for unemployment, but he did not express any sympathetic emotion in this paragraph. Later in the letter he expresses his sympathies, but this portion was cold and lifeless.

Some changes I would make to this letter would be as follows. In Dr. Visnich’s statement he said “my office” he might have said, “our office,” instead seeing as she was a part of the staff. Even though it’s his name on the business using words like “us” and “our” would help her feel part of something. He should have coupled language to express his sympathy and his hope for her in the future with the speech act of laying her off. He might have said something to the effect of “Going through chemotherapy is taxing on the body and the last thing on your mind in this struggle would be helping out at our office. I have chosen to lay you off so that you might have time to fight and win this battle against cancer. You have been a valued employee and I am grateful to have employed you for the past 12 years. You will qualify for unemployment because of this layoff and will be able to receive financial help through unemployment while not having to worry about struggling through the pain of cancer treatment in addition to the responsibilities you had at the office. This will give you a chance to fight and win.” Something to this effect would feel more personal and heartfelt.


Primarily I would have called instead of sending this letter. I would have talked to this woman in person and expressed to her my sympathies and my plan for the future. Because of this poorly communicated message Dr. Visnich has suffered a blow to his reputation that he might not recover from. Communicating properly in a professional setting has lasting consequences. 

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Online Reputation of Artemio S. Cacanindin

TO: Artemio S. Cacanindin

FROM: Ben Fredrickson

DATE: September 24, 2014

SUBJECT: Your Internet Presence

Artemio I am in a state of confusion right now. You haven't posted anything on your blog other than the the assignment due on September 24. Not only that, you haven't signed up to be a member of the USU CMST 3050: Technical and Professional Communication (2014) Facebook group which was a requirement for receiving class information. In fact the only information available on the only assignment that you have completed is found in the CMST 3050 Facebook group. I am seriously beginning to doubt the legitimacy of your existence. The only person on Facebook with the name “Artemio Cacanindin” happens to be an Elderly gentleman living in Denver Colorado. The odds of this man being a student at USU are slim.

Artemio Cacanindin on Facebook.

Thus began my quest to prove to myself your non-existence. I found a handful of Artemio Cacanindins living in California as well as one in Washington. It is unlikely that any of these current residents of states other than Utah are students at Utah State University.

It is also unlikely that a current student at USU has graduated from the University of Washington in 1984 with a Bachelors of Science and a Masters of Science in 1985.



The only information that I could find pertaining to a man named Artemio S. Cacanindin who was possibly a student at USU was the birth record of a 23 year old man named Artemio Sean Cacanindin. Having been born November 28, 1991 in California, it is possible that this man could be a current student at Utah State University.





My conclusion is that you are even less of a real boy than Pinocchio was. I can find no indication that there is a person by the name of Artemio S. Cacanindin attending Utah State University. On the off chance that you happen to be real I suggest you start a profile on LinkedIn and connect Utah State University in your profile. If you have a corporeal form, it is not represented anywhere I could discover on the internet.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Letter to Cousin

September 3, 2014

Dear Sarah Olsen,

I am excited by your interest in learning about technical and professional communication. To begin, technical and professional communication is referring to communication between individuals in a professional setting. When I am speaking with you as your cousin and your friend I would use different words than if I were trying to communicate with you in a professional manner. I imagine this first paragraph alone is worded in a way that you find different and peculiar to our general communications.

When we are speaking to our friends and acquaintances the communication we use is often focused on humor or maintaining relationships. The priorities for professional communication are slightly different. Two priorities that I would like you to remember are that professional communication needs to be clear and concise. The objective in communicating in a professional environment is to get a specific message across. You should refrain from unnecessary extra words. The shorter the sentence can be and still retain the desired meaning, the better. I know you enjoy song writing and writing poetry. Often in poetry things are unclear intentionally to convey a certain feeling through a metaphor or other literary device. Your poetry is excellent and I love listening to your songs as well, but professional writing is very different. Remember your goal is to be clear and concise.

Avoid using contractions. Contractions can often be confusing and eliminating them from your communication will help you be clearer. Remember to proof read everything you write in professional setting. No matter how large or small the written communication is you must proof read it.

Punctuation and grammar are very important in technical and professional writing. When you are writing an email or a letter in a professional setting your credibility is important. One way to quickly destroy credibility in a professional communication is to have improper grammar or punctuation. You enjoy watching Youtube videos and you have mentioned to me how humorous it is when someone is trying to make a criticism about a video and they make a blatant spelling error. It robs them of their credibility very quickly. It is the same in professional communication. If you use incorrect grammar or punctuation you will lose credibility.

From what I have explained it might seem that in professional communication the message is more important than the way you express the message. While it is very important to be clear and concise, it is also critical to be polite and thoughtful in your communication. Communication is lubricant for life and learning to be polite in addition to clear will make your life run smoother. Avoid using words that could be construed as vulgar or impolite. Do not ever use words that are considered swear words in professional communication. Always show respect to who you are communicating with regardless of their professional station.

I know you will have no trouble communicating on a professional level. You are as intelligent as you are kind, and you are one of the kindest persons I have ever known.

Thank you for your time,


Sincerely yours,

Ben Fredrickson